Civil Service Exam Reviewer · Reading Comprehension · hard
The Power of a Sugar Pill
In clinical trials, patients who receive a sugar pill instead of a real drug often report feeling better. This placebo effect is sometimes dismissed as imagination, but it is more interesting than that. Expectation can produce measurable changes in the body, particularly in symptoms such as pain, nausea, and fatigue, which are shaped by how the brain interprets signals. Even the details of a treatment matter: in some studies, larger pills, more expensive-looking packaging, and injections have produced stronger placebo responses than small, plain tablets. Yet the placebo effect has clear limits. A sugar pill will not shrink a tumor, mend a broken bone, or clear a bacterial infection. Its power lies mainly in how illness is experienced rather than in the underlying disease. This is precisely why medical researchers compare new drugs against placebos. If patients taking a new medicine improve no more than those taking a dummy pill, the medicine's apparent benefit may be due entirely to expectation. Understanding the placebo effect thus protects patients in two ways: it reminds doctors that the manner of care can ease suffering, and it prevents ineffective treatments from being mistaken for real cures.
Why do researchers compare new drugs against placebos?
- To save money on real medicines
- To make patients recover faster
- To find out whether a drug's benefit exceeds what expectation alone produces
- To test whether sugar is harmful
Answer
C. To find out whether a drug's benefit exceeds what expectation alone produces
Solution
If patients on the drug improve no more than those on a dummy pill, the benefit may be due entirely to expectation.
More Reading Comprehension questions
- How do defenders of the freeze propose to address the supply problem?
- On what point do both sides agree?
- In the economists' argument, hoarding is a result of
- Defenders of the freeze argue that high prices during a disaster may
- According to the economists' argument, rising prices after a disaster
- The researchers mentioned would advise a correction that
- According to the passage, false news spreads faster partly because it is
- "Prebunking" refers to
- Why can repeating a falsehood in a correction backfire?
- What is the "structural disadvantage" that fact-checkers face?