Civil Service Exam Reviewer · Reading Comprehension · hard
Mangroves: The Living Seawall
When a storm surge strikes a coastline, a belt of mangrove forest can do what concrete often cannot: it absorbs energy gradually. The tangled roots and dense trunks slow the incoming water, reducing the height and force of waves before they reach homes. Mangroves also trap sediment, allowing the shoreline to build up over time rather than erode, and they serve as nurseries for many fish that coastal communities depend on. For much of the twentieth century, however, mangroves were regarded as wasteland. Large areas were cleared to make way for fishponds, salt beds, and settlements, and the losses only became widely appreciated after major typhoons revealed how exposed some coasts had become. Replanting has since become popular, but enthusiasm has outpaced understanding. Volunteers have sometimes planted a single fast-growing species in neat rows on mudflats or seagrass beds where mangroves never naturally grew, and many of those seedlings died within a few years. Restoration experts now stress that success depends less on the number of seedlings planted than on restoring the right conditions, especially the natural flow of tides, so that mangroves can return on their own. A forest, they remind us, is not merely a collection of trees.
The statement "enthusiasm has outpaced understanding" means that
- experts were more enthusiastic than volunteers
- replanting happened more slowly than expected
- people were eager to replant before they knew how to do it properly
- mangroves grow faster than scientists can study them
Answer
C. people were eager to replant before they knew how to do it properly
Solution
Enthusiasm got ahead of understanding, which led to poorly sited planting.
More Reading Comprehension questions
- The final sentence implies that
- Why did many replanted seedlings die, according to the passage?
- According to the passage, mangroves protect coasts mainly by
- The author would most likely agree that a troubled project should continue only if
- The phrase "refusing to stop can turn one error into two" means that
- According to the passage, why is the sunk-cost fallacy hard to resist?
- Assuming both bridges serve the public equally well, which choice does the economists' reasoning favor?
- In the example, the "sunk cost" is
- The author would most likely support
- What can be inferred from the passage?