Civil Service Exam Reviewer · Reading Comprehension · hard

When Numbers Rise Together

A city health office once noticed that barangays with more fast-food outlets also had higher rates of high blood pressure. A councilor quickly proposed limiting new fast-food permits, arguing that the restaurants were making people sick. The proposal was popular, but a statistician on the staff urged caution. The two figures rose together, she explained, but that did not prove that one caused the other. Barangays with many fast-food outlets also tended to be the most densely populated and the most commercial; their residents worked longer hours, slept less, and walked less because they commuted by vehicle. Any of these factors could raise blood pressure on its own, and any of them could also attract restaurants. A third factor that drives two others in this way is called a confounding variable. The statistician did not claim that fast food was harmless. Her point was narrower: before restricting businesses, the city should gather evidence that could separate the effect of diet from the effects of stress, sleep, and inactivity, for example by comparing residents of similar barangays who differ mainly in what they eat. Policies built on mistaken causes, she warned, can burden the public without improving anyone's health.

Which study would best follow the statistician's recommendation?

  1. Counting fast-food outlets in more barangays
  2. Comparing residents of similar barangays who differ mainly in their diet
  3. Asking residents whether they enjoy fast food
  4. Measuring blood pressure only in commercial barangays

Answer

B. Comparing residents of similar barangays who differ mainly in their diet

Solution

The passage itself suggests comparing similar barangays that differ mainly in what residents eat, which isolates diet.

More Reading Comprehension questions

  1. Which best describes the statistician's position?
  2. In the passage, an example of a confounding variable is
  3. The primary purpose of the passage is to
  4. According to the passage, both groups of historians agree that
  5. Which point from the passage supports the view that the trade had lasting benefits?
  6. What can be inferred about many Spanish residents of Manila?
  7. As used in the passage, a "lopsided" economy is one that is
  8. The passage mainly focuses on
  9. The final sentence suggests that
  10. What can be inferred about frequent task-switchers?

All Reading Comprehension Reviewer questions